Controlling Combustible Dust

By -

Controlling Combustible Dust and Spillage

One of the primary issues at pellet mill facilities is controlling combustible dust and spillage.
By Greg Bierie | May 17, 2021

One of the primary issues at pellet mill facilities is controlling combustible dust and spillage.  Personnel safety and regulatory compliance are also top of mind in the corporate safety culture. Increasingly, maintenance and operations personnel are making use of new tools and leading-edge technologies to ensure that their jobs can be performed efficiently and safely.

As a general statement, if maintenance is made easy to perform with minimal downtime, the corporate goals of maximum production can mesh perfectly with maintenance and operations goals to maximize reliability and minimize downtime.

Using a “toolbox” approach to total dust management and spillage control allows the pellet mill industry to address the problems at the source. This philosophy focuses on using safety by design in developing new technologies that are conceived by plant professionals, for use by plant professionals. If maintenance is easy to perform, it will get done. If problems are addressed at the source, the Band-Aid approach can be eliminated.

The problems and solutions that combine “safety by design” with robust products and systems to achieve compliance and improve performance include the following areas of focus:
• Lower risk, increase safety, prevent spillage
• Reduce cleanup and transfer cost, improve material flow
• Regulatory compliance with agencies, NGOs and local community

Project Examples
The following few examples of recent projects that address above issues. 

In Example 1, improvements were made to alleviate issues with transfer points and modular load zones at a wood pellet transfer and storage facility. As can be seen in Image 1 and Image 2, a dramatic difference was achieved. No additional dust control measures were necessary to eliminate the problem in this enclosed conveyor system. By controlling material flow and minimizing entrained air along with soft loading and center loading of wood pellets onto the receiving belt, the dust and risks of fire or explosion were reduced well below the acceptable level. Leading edge technologies were utilized to cure the problem at the source.


For Example 2, Image 3 and Image 4 demonstrate, at this facility, sliding friction and poor sealing was increasing fire risk at load zone areas using impact beds. The mill workers saw and smelled smoke to indicate a dangerous situation in which combustible material had built up on adjacent structure. The solution to this issue included many leading-edge technologies to cure the problems at the source. These included, but were not limited to, the MaxZone Plus—a system that acts as a modified load zone chute with an additional way to reduce dust and spillage at the load zone—and SureGuide Training Idlers, which are belt-centralizing return pulleys made of precision-turned components (see Image 5).

In conclusion, doing the same old thing will produce the same old results. New equipment should not be confused with new technology. The products and project results as shown above are due to adopting new technologies. The combination of these technologies solve the problems at the source.  Safety by design aims to eliminate issues such as confined space entry required for service, ergonomics for and maintenance, and maintenance made easy so that it can be performed by one person in the field. In addition, rolling components replace sliding components that produce friction and heat, along with special foot patterns and slide-out rollers to make service simple and sealing secure. Modular componentry eliminates the need for hot work in construction, and all internal components are externally serviceable by one person. Material flow is controlled to minimize dust and spillage, and ensure proper belt loading. 

Above all, regulatory compliance can be achieved, the corporate safety culture is enhanced, and the risk of fire or explosions from combustible dust is eliminated at the source.

Author: Greg Bierie
Technology Specialist, Benetech Global
bierieg@benetechusa.com
www.benetechglobal.comControlling Combustible Dust and Spillage

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fire Triangle, Fire Tetrahedron and Dust Explosion Pentagon

By -
Image
Fire Triangle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search The fire triangle. The fire triangle or combustion triangle is a simple model for understanding the ingredients necessary for most fires . [1] It has been replaced in the fire fighting and protection industry partially by the fire tetrahedron (see below). The triangle illustrates a fire requires three elements: heat , fuel , and an oxidizing agent (usually oxygen ). The fire is prevented or extinguished by removing any one of them. A fire naturally occurs when the elements are combined in the right mixture. Without sufficient heat , a fire cannot begin, and it cannot continue. Heat can be removed by the application of a substance which reduces the amount of heat available to the fire reaction. This is often water, which requires heat for phase change from water to steam. Introducing sufficient quantities and types of powder or gas in the flame reduces the amount of heat available for t
Read more

Are Spices Flammable?

By -
Is Cinnamon Flammable? - Science - ChefSteps Made from the dried bark of Cinnamomum verum , a tree indigenous to Sri Lanka, cinnamon's exotic perfume and subtle flavor come from its two major components: cinnamaldehyde and eugenol. These two chemicals are volatile, meaning they readily vaporize at temperatures comfortable to humans, which is in fact why cinnamon is so fragrant. But those same vapors are also highly combustible (indeed, combustion only happens in the presence of vapors), making cinnamon a highly flammable material under the right conditions. Now a cloud of cinnamon dust isn’t the kind of thing most people would consider dangerous, but add enough heat and you’ll quickly have an expanding ball of fire known as a dust explosion. For dealing with this situation, we can only recommend a good pair of running shoes. In fact, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration issues warnings about cinnamon explosions in food manufacturing plants.
Read more

Functional Safety Audit vs. Functional Safety Assessment

By -
From Chemical Processing Don’t Confuse a Functional Safety Audit with a Functional Safety Assessment Understand the critical differences between the two essential evaluations By John Walkington, ABB Safety Lead Competency Centre Apr 19, 2017 Many people working in safety instrumented system (SIS) project development, execution, operation and maintenance treat a functional safety audit (FS Audit) and a functional safety assessment (FSA) as one and the same. So, based on this assumption, they simply ensure that such an activity is undertaken and perhaps signify the need to perform this evaluation at some point when it appears as a milestone on the project schedule. Moreover, often they call upon someone working on the project, who may or may not have had some previous experience in quality auditing, to deliver this audit/assessment. However, this is not a reasonable approach because the concepts for the audit and assessment markedly differ. An FS Audit provides
Read more