Chemical safety best practices

By Anonymous -

From: Safety and Health Magazine 

https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/21720-chemical-safety-best-practices


What are the best practices, and proactive measures being taken, to ensure chemical safety in the workplace?

September 26, 2021

 

Origami-Risk.jpg
Photo: Origami Risk LLC

Responding is Sean Salvas, senior market strategy lead – EHS, Origami Risk LLC, Chicago.

Chemical safety practices in the United States have been steadily expanding over the years, especially after the 2012 adoption of elements of the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals into OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (1910.1200).

Notably, this action led to new hazard labeling requirements, the creation of the 16-section Safety Data Sheet format and new hazard classifications.

The UN has introduced subsequent editions of GHS yet to be adopted by OSHA. However, the agency’s latest proposal to update the Hazard Communication Standard with the seventh edition of the GHS will bring more changes, including:

  • New hazard classification categories for aerosols, desensitized explosives and flammable gases, along with revised hazard and precautionary statements.
  • New or revised definitions for combustible dust, gas, exposure or exposed, and other terms.
  • The reconciliation of Hazard Communication Standard labeling requirements with those of the Department of Transportation, including streamlined labeling requirements for small chemical containers.
  • Added concentration ranges on SDSs to help identify substances with formulations classified as confidential business information.

Besides ensuring compliance with globally accepted standards, the new requirements focus on human safety and health as well as preventing environmental damage.

Apart from the regulatory developments, organizations are proactively addressing all aspects of chemical use, including their manufacture, transport, use, handling, storage and disposal. Many are implementing best practices, including:
Establishing chemical standard operating procedures, which cover different aspects of chemical handling, such as delivery of raw materials, storage and disposal.
Routine inspections and maintenance, which keep organizations informed of potential chemical hazards and risk profiles.
Periodic hazard communication training, including instruction on safety protocols as well as drills to prepare for and respond to incidental chemical releases or related catastrophes.
Ensuring proper controls are in place, such as ventilation to pump out noxious gases, or being equipped with alarms and gas sensors to detect air toxicity levels, as well as the Hierarchy of Controls to eliminate hazards or apply appropriate safety measures where necessary.
Ensuring safe chemical storage, so chemicals are stored in appropriate containers and at correct temperatures and pressure levels, properly labeled, accessible yet well protected, and checked regularly.
Prioritizing asset maintenance, including keeping to routines to minimize risks of leaks or spills, and ongoing monitoring of equipment, pipes, storage containers and the environment to optimize chemical operations and ensure safety.
Performing assessments of personal protective equipment, including the evaluation of the integrity and use of all goggles, lab gowns, rubber gloves, hazmat suits and respiratory protection (self-contained breathing apparatuses, etc.) required for handling toxic and corrosive chemicals.
Establishing environmental protection measures, such as standard protocols for spills (including containment procedures) as well as staff training on first aid and emergency equipment such as fire extinguishers, drench showers and readily available first aid kits.

In addition to the various proactive safety measures adopted by industry, newly proposed regulations will help advance efforts to mitigate risks chemicals pose to employees, the public and the environment.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fire Triangle, Fire Tetrahedron and Dust Explosion Pentagon

By -
Image
Fire Triangle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search The fire triangle. The fire triangle or combustion triangle is a simple model for understanding the ingredients necessary for most fires . [1] It has been replaced in the fire fighting and protection industry partially by the fire tetrahedron (see below). The triangle illustrates a fire requires three elements: heat , fuel , and an oxidizing agent (usually oxygen ). The fire is prevented or extinguished by removing any one of them. A fire naturally occurs when the elements are combined in the right mixture. Without sufficient heat , a fire cannot begin, and it cannot continue. Heat can be removed by the application of a substance which reduces the amount of heat available to the fire reaction. This is often water, which requires heat for phase change from water to steam. Introducing sufficient quantities and types of powder or gas in the flame reduces the amount of heat available for t...
Read more

Are Spices Flammable?

By -
Image
Is Cinnamon Flammable? - Science - ChefSteps Made from the dried bark of Cinnamomum verum , a tree indigenous to Sri Lanka, cinnamon's exotic perfume and subtle flavor come from its two major components: cinnamaldehyde and eugenol. These two chemicals are volatile, meaning they readily vaporize at temperatures comfortable to humans, which is in fact why cinnamon is so fragrant. But those same vapors are also highly combustible (indeed, combustion only happens in the presence of vapors), making cinnamon a highly flammable material under the right conditions. Now a cloud of cinnamon dust isn’t the kind of thing most people would consider dangerous, but add enough heat and you’ll quickly have an expanding ball of fire known as a dust explosion. For dealing with this situation, we can only recommend a good pair of running shoes. In fact, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration issues warnings about cinnamon explosions in food manufacturing plants....
Read more

Functional Safety Audit vs. Functional Safety Assessment

By -
From Chemical Processing Don’t Confuse a Functional Safety Audit with a Functional Safety Assessment Understand the critical differences between the two essential evaluations By John Walkington, ABB Safety Lead Competency Centre Apr 19, 2017 Many people working in safety instrumented system (SIS) project development, execution, operation and maintenance treat a functional safety audit (FS Audit) and a functional safety assessment (FSA) as one and the same. So, based on this assumption, they simply ensure that such an activity is undertaken and perhaps signify the need to perform this evaluation at some point when it appears as a milestone on the project schedule. Moreover, often they call upon someone working on the project, who may or may not have had some previous experience in quality auditing, to deliver this audit/assessment. However, this is not a reasonable approach because the concepts for the audit and assessment markedly differ. An FS Audit provides...
Read more